About Me

Name: OnceAlwaysaMarine
Email: sanctuary1choir@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

President Obama-A National Disgrace

 From Kevin McCollough's blog (and I agree):

Saturday, November 07, 2009
Posted by: Kevin McCullough at 8:17 AM
 
"Reports have surfaced that the administration is refusing to look at the shooting at Ft. Hood as a possible act of Islamic terror. This despite the fact that the prime shooter in the case is historically documented with Islamic jihadist ramblings on internet pages. The simple question is this, if these reports turn out to be true, should we demand the resignation of the responsible parties? Even if the chain of communication goes all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.? 800.345.9622."

_____________________________________________

Another thing about this case, and one that should cause every American to question the character of this President, is his inability to display any solidarity with either our troops risking their lives on the battlefield or those who are presently reeling from this Islamist's attack from within their ranks at home.

While the community of soldiers at Ft. Hood are grieving and have to be asking the questions crossing the minds of ALL Americans concerned with their security -Are there any more Arabic descent soldiers who will be swayed by some understanding of their roles as Muslims to commit similar acts?- this president remains detached, aloof, nonchalant, and defiant in his determination to distance himself from those who operate on the front lines of the war of Islamic aggression being waged against our country from without- and now from within our own ranks.

 What kind of President would not have already, and immediately, suspended all scheduled business to attend to the soldiers on that base in person- knowing how much power would be in that gesture alone? - "I am here, I came to stand by you and stand with you. I assure you that no stone will be left unturned; no question go unasked; and no amount of effort will be spared to get to the bottom of this and to make sure that something like this will never be allowed to happen to our brave men and women who spearhead our nation's defense!"

Not this President- not Barack Hussein Obama. In Illinois, he was known to vote "present" more than any other Senator. Here, he pretends to not even have a vote...or a role to play at all. That's his first dereliction of duty.

What President, knowing the questions and concerns that are roiling in the minds and souls of the American people—some who even have sons and daughters and grandchildren stationed at Ft. Hood and other military bases throughout the country and throughout the world—would maintain such an aloofness as to not find it necessary to address the American people in a formal way; speaking to them about what is taking place in the way of getting to the bottom of this situation?  A situation in our military vetting policies and decision-making  which allowed for a Muslim soldier who time-and-time again gave every indication of the psychological and spiritual difficulty he was having in carrying out his role as a high-ranking member of the U.S. Armed Forces to continue to be promoted; rather than immediately removed from active duty—transferred from Walter Reed Army Hospital—to interact on one of our nation’s most front line bases with the very individuals whose mission and actions in Iraq & Afghanistan he was well- known to be having difficulty in reconciling with as legitimate.

This President –in an unprecedented display of insensitivity; an apparent lack of common decency; and with no apparent understanding of the role that is his by virtue of being the sitting President of these United States—instead of addressing the nation as is any President’s solemn duty to do—has sought to detach himself from the semblance of any responsibility to address us at all. Dereliction of duty number two.

 This incident—this terrorist attack against unarmed soldiers in garrison—committed by a man who was allowed to wear the uniform of our Army while openly harboring and voicing such resentment against the very cause for which those who wear it are enlisted—is not a tragedy—it is a travesty against all that is America and most glaringly against our Armed Service members. Equally a travesty, is Barack Hussein Obama being their so-called Commander-in-Chief.

It is not enough to dispatch Eric Holder’s FBI investigators to “clean up the mess” while the President remains engaged in –and only concerned with—twisting the arms of reticent Congressmen to shove his latest socialist takeover down the throats of an unwilling public. What could possibly be more important than making his presence felt at our latest Ground Zero. Fort Hood is Ground Zero today. And no amount of denial and false labeling will convince us that it’s not. This was America’s second Islamic terrorist attack since Barack Obama took office. When the first occurred in April at the Army Recruiting Center in Little Rock—he said nothing. The second occurred on November 5th 2009 and he does nothing. 

Rather, he seemed to be perturbed that it spoiled his speech and ‘shout outs’ in apologizing—once again—for America’s insensitivity to American Indian tribal leaders—only giving time to make the most cursory of comments, masked as condolences—before resuming his latest tabulation of America’s evils.

That this President—Barack Hussein Obama—has displayed neither the will nor the leadership to confront this issue and speak to it—to the world and to the citizen of this nation to at least give the appearance of leadership—is an abomination; a travesty; and a national disgrace.  

No…no…no. Not “God damn America….”

God damn Barack Hussein Obama.

This, above all else he has shown, should be proof-positive, that Barack Hussein Obama is not one of us—and that whatever he is—he does not have America’s best interests at heart.

Barack Hussein Obama—the most disgraceful, unqualified, and anti-American President in American history.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Asking the Million Dollar Question Nobody Else Seems to be Asking

The most important thing to note about what took place tonight with both New Jersey and Virginia governorships being won by Conservative Republican candidates is that 2 states with a significant number of electoral college votes (NJ-15; V-13) just went from being Blue states to Red states...Obama losing both, only 1 year after having won them. That, and Obama's own statement on the significance of NJ is what definitely makes this a referendum on the Obama failed first year as president.

As evidence of the rejection of Obama by the voters, esp. in NJ, this story was carried by MSNBC on Sunday during Obama's 11th hour rallies for Corzine in NJ:

CAMDEN, N.J. - In a final campaign swing on behalf of the only governor seeking re-election this fall, President Barack Obama on Sunday pitched Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine's bid as a key component for the White House to make good on its political promises.

"He's one of the best partners I have in the White House. We work together," Obama said. "We know our work is far from over."

Obama drew 6,500 people at a rally in Camden and another 11,000 later in Newark, according to White House estimates. He urged supporters to work hard to give Corzine another term in office so he can work with Washington to help repair a brittle economy. A Corzine loss would be seen as a political embarrassment for the White House."
__________________________________________

There isn't any way they would have admitted this had they not really thought Obama's appearances could put Corzine over the top. Knowing that the White House and their propaganda arm in the Network News organizations will try to downplay tonight's results, I'm scanning all the archival evidence I can, proving just how important (and how crushing) a defeat this was for Obamaism.
 
New Jersey and Virginia each have relatively large numbers of electoral votes (15 NJ; 13 V). It is not insignificant that both of these important states went from being Democrat Blue States to Republican Red States. That's way more important than what happened anywhere else.

How many MORE states has Obama lost in just 1 year?

That's the million dollar question.

I suspect these 2 aren't the only states that went into the Red column in the 2008 elections Barack Hussein Obama and his coming out of the closet as an unabashed anti-free market, anti-liberty Marxist will lose for the Democrats.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

They Don't Want Us to See the Forest for the Trees

 

These people [this entire administration] are un-American. They are engaged in a war against our country. It's as simple as that.

This is not an accusation...it's a fact.

The problem they are now facing is the fact that they cannot regulate the information the American people are getting from Talk Radio and the Internet blogs...and that because of that...it has taken only a short time for the people of this country to recognize the triangulation that is being perpetrated against them, using ALL aspects of authority and government control to subjugate the free-market, stifle dissent, eradicate the notion of morality, and indoctrinate our children...all disguised as "social justice" and "social equality."

Take, for example, the latest controversy concerning one such "social justice" advocate in the Obama administration, if it were ever to be viewed in its proper context, would support that which you are trying to warn the American people.

The appointment of Homosexual Advocate, Kevin Jennings as Safe Schools Czar, needs to be viewed within the overall context of what this administration is trying to achieve.

It is just ONE piece in the overall scheme of the Barack Hussein Obama administration's goal in "re-education" and "transformation" of America.

Let's examine the ramifications of Kevin Jennings' agenda and how it came to be that THIS particular individual was selected for the second highest [if not, in actuality, the highest] position in the Department of Education:

Kevin Jennings, Barack Hussein Obama's Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug FreeSchools at the U.S. Department of Education is linked to Barack Hussein Obama by their mutual admiration of one William "Bill" Ayers--

--you know, the Chicago Political Operative & Education Consigliere--where at his home the nobody, at the time, Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama had to be taken to to give his prop's to at the time his undistinguished Illinois political career was fixed?

Jennings wrote the forward "to a book called Queering Elementary Education.

And guess who wrote one of the endorsements on the book Queering Elementary Education's jacket?

—none other than the infamous— Elemementary School Theorist & Convicted Weather Underground Bomber and Obama mentor, Bill Ayers.

Bill Ayers' job at the University of Illinois-Chicago is to help set the agenda for Elementary School Education.

Kevin Jennings is now Obama's Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug FreeSchools at the U.S. Department of Education.

No need for YOU to connect the dots...

I just did it for you.

It would take a willing suspension of disbelief to believe Barack Hussein Obama doesn't know EXACTLY what Kevin Jennings is about...

...and what he's up to.

But Obama (and Ayers) think they can get away with hiding in plain sight.

They think we can't see the forest, for the trees.
Jennings was carefully chosen for a particular purpose...but one which advances the overall hidden agenda of the Obama administration.

Jennings, himself an activist homosexual, wants homosexuality to be taught in American schools -- in his book Always My Child, Jennings calls for a “diversity policy that mandates including LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] themes in the curriculum.” But he wants only one side of this controversial issue to be aired, and apparently believes in locking sexually confused kids into a “gay” identity. That’s the implication of his declaration, “Ex-gay messages have no place in our nation’s public schools. A line has been drawn. There is no ‘other side’ when you’re talking about lesbian, gay and bisexual students.”

Jennings does not limit his promotion of homosexuality in schools only to high schools or middle schools. He wrote the foreword for a book titled Queering Elementary Education, which includes an essay declaring that “‘queerly raised’ children are agents” using “strategies of adaptation, negotiation, resistance, and subversion.”

Where are the separation of church and state advocates and protesters on this?

This type of indoctrination should be subjected to the same rules that prohibit teaching about faith in public schools. This meets all the criteria of religious teaching.

This is prozeletyzing for a belief system...one designed to separate us from our Christian (religious) beliefs.

You knew Bill Ayers is an unrepentant domestic terrorist who set bombs in the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon and several other government buildings.

You knew Ayers still hates capitalism and our efforts to protect South Vietnam from communist oppression.

And you knew that Barack Obama associated with him anyway.

What you may not have known is that Ayers is a radical supporter of the homosexual agenda.

WorldNetDaily features a piece by Linda Harvey on a book endorsed by Bill Ayers called "Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling" by William J. Letts IV and James T. Sears. The book calls for teaching adults and children to "think queerly," or in a manner positive toward homosexuality.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=77640
Ayers endorsement is featured on the back jacket of the book:

Queering Elementary Education is an important contribution to nourishing the ethical heart of teaching, reminding us how anemic and cold and partial our embrace of our students has too often been. For some readers this collection will be an affirmation, for others a surprise and challenge. But it is a book for all teachers and parents, indeed for anyone concerned with the healthy development of children and schools.
 
This is what the WND article says about the book: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=77640

"Queering" includes essays about the need to affirm "sissy boys" in middle school, re-educating parents who object to teaching grade-schoolers about homosexual-headed families, in spite of the fact that some critics are the "rabid and self-appointed moral police" and the benefit of classrooms that don't observe Mother's Day or Father's Day.

Another author, discussing "queeer theory," tells us that "presumed heterosexuality … is an artifact of oppression." Thus, we get down to some specifics about so-called social justice education.

Phyllis Schafly had this warning about Ayers' influence and agenda when she posed the question, "Will William Ayers be secretary of education in a Barack Obama administration?:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=29115

"Ayers's political views are as radical now as they were in the 1970s. "Viva President Chavez!" he exclaimed in a speech in Venezuela in 2006, in which he also declared, "education is the motor-force of revolution."

"From his prestigious and safe university position, Ayers has been teaching teachers and students in rebellion against American capitalism and what he calls "imperialism" and "oppression."

The code words for the Ayers curriculum are "social justice," a "transformative" vision, "critical pedagogy," "liberation," "capitalist injustices," "critical race theory," "queeer theory," and of course multiculturalism and feminism.

That language is typical in the readings that Ayers assigns in his university courses.

He admits he is a "communist street fighter" who has been influenced by Karl Marx, as well as Che Guevara, Ho Chi Minh and Malcolm X.

...as did Barack Hussein Obama...in the books it is now being widely suggested that Bill Ayers' may have written for him.

Instead of Ayers (who would have been too controversial) Obama elevated the next best thing to carry out that part of the agenda--Kevin Jennings.

Dr. Thomas Sowell, in his Townhall article
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Thomas Sowell :: Townhall.com Columnist
Random Thoughts
by Thomas Sowell
 
posits:
 
"Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Muammar Qaddafi and Vladimir Putin have all praised Barack Obama. When enemies of freedom and democracy praise your president, what are you to think?"

He is right to be concerned.

These people reject EVERY tenet upon which the American system of governance was founded....and their every attention is given to destroying it.

Obama, Ayers, Jennings, and EACH ONE of the other "Czars" share the EXACT SAME ideologies as do these people...make no mistake about it.

Their heroes aren't Washington, Jefferson, and Madison.

Their heroes are Marx, Marshall-Davis, and Mao.

They are in a race against the time when Americans will wake up...man up...and face up to the fact that they have declared war...

on us.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LET'S CUT ANOTHER HEAD OFF THE SNAKE

 
More on the Obama/Jones/Valerie Jarrett Connection

Take it from Michelle Malkin:

Van Jones did not just accidentally slip through the cracks of the Obama vetters. They knew what he espoused before they installed him.

"Take it from Obama’s own political godmother Michelle and Barack’s consigliere and Chicago powerbroker Valerie Jarrett took full credit at the nuttroots dKos blogger conference last month (August 15, 2009) for recruiting him and closely following his career:

JARRETT:. You guys know Van Jones? [Applause. Moderator injects: 'This is his house apparently.']

JARRETT: Oooh. Van Jones, alright! So, Van Jones. We were so delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House. We were watching him, uh, really, he’s not that old, for as long as he’s been active out in Oakland. And all the creative ideas he has. And so now, we have captured that. And we have all that energy in the White House."
_____________________________________________

There is a pattern of Socialist and Marxist influence in this administration, the likes of which, has never been seen.

How many more foxes are in the henhouse. Let’s encourage Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Michelle Malkin, Charles Krauthammer, Jillian Bandes, Caro Platt Liebeau, Michael Savage, and all our other radio hosts and Townhall writers onward.

This is a defining moment in our country’s history. We are literally engaged in a battle for the survival of our Constitution and our Republic…let’s expose EVERY ONE of the “czars”…and in so doing, expose and defeat the number one Czar Barack Hussein Obama.

There are many more foxes in the henhouse. Beck and the others need to check out Carol Browner, Obama's climate change czar. She is an avowed socialist who was a member of an international socialist organization that supports world governance.
Stephen Dinan wrote an article in the Washington Times’ January 12, 2009 edition entitled: “Obama climate czar has socialist ties
Group sees 'global governance' as solution”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/12/obama-clima te-czar-has-socialist-ties/

The following is an excerpt from that article:

"Until last week, Carol M. Browner, President-elect Barack Obama's pick as global warming czar, was listed as one of 14 leaders of a socialist group's Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which calls for "global governance" and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change.

By Thursday [Jan.2009], Mrs. Browner's name and biography had been removed from Socialist International's Web page, though a photo of her speaking June 30 to the group's congress in Greece was still available.

Socialist International, an umbrella group for many of the world's social democratic political parties such as Britain's Labor Party, says it supports socialism and is harshly critical of U.S. policies.

The group's Commission for a Sustainable World Society, the organization's action arm on climate change, says the developed world must reduce consumption and commit to binding and punitive limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

Mr. Obama, who has said action on climate change would be a priority in his administration, tapped Mrs. Browner last month to fill a new position as White House coordinator of climate and energy policies. The appointment does not need Senate confirmation.

Mr. Obama's transition team said Mrs. Browner's membership in the organization is not a problem and that it brings experience in U.S. policymaking to her new role.”
Until January 2009, Carol Browner was listed as one of fourteen leaders of Socialist International.

The group calls for rich countries to shrink their economies in order to combat climate change. However, her name was removed from organization's website after Barack Obama appointed her to be his coordinator of energy and climate policy.

The American people were warned by many of us during the 2008 election cycle, about the fact that Barack Hussein Obama’s Marxism and anti-American views. But even we did not know the full level of his hatred and intentions to undermine the civil society and Constitution.

What we are seeing now, with his desperation and full-on assault on our every institution, could not have come at a better time for us to stop this juggernaut in its tracks. Remember, there was never intended to BE any healthcare debate! Obama, Pelosi, and Reid wanted this H.R.3200 signed into law BEFORE the August recess.

They never intended for the American people (or other members of Congress for that matter) to have knowledge of what was in the bill.

Now the ever-duplicitous Obama media has taken, once again, the leading role in presenting the spin that this is all about a healthcare debate.

The Mainstream media has proven that they are now the State-run Socialist media and propagandists for the Barack Hussein Obama administration, but for all their collusion and machinations, they have learned a very harsh lesson…the have no monopoly on the truth.

Maybe Glenn Beck and the others can help us cut another snake off this Medusa’s head…

Carol Browner would be a good start…with Valerie Jarrett close behind.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A "LESSON PLAN" FOR THE STUPID

 

The State-run media thinks you're Stupid and you are If you trust anything they write or say.

I watched their reporting of this story last evening...and true to form, their parrot trolls are out in force with the same tired liberal strategy of irrelevant relevancy, projection, and purposeful obfuscation of the facts.

Yes...other presidents have spoken to the nation's schoolchildren.

But NO other president and his administration has submitted a politically-charged and self-serving "Lesson Plan" encouraging the teachers of those children to cultivate their youthful minds with cultish questions about "What can we do to help our president?" and "What do you think the president is asking you to do?" and "What do you think he will say next time?"

These children are being carefully programmed to think about, and ponder nothing but Barack Hussein Obama; both BEFORE and AFTER his speech. The White House and DOE, in putting this "Lesson Plan" together, even goes so far as to suggest follow up projects dealing with Obama's speech; kids testifying before their classmates about the speech (whether singularly or in groups of two); and writing letters about how they can "help" President Barack Obama.

Help him do WHAT?

This is unprecedented in a free country, especially the United States of America.

But the mainstream media last night, true to form, ignored this little tidbit...even though it ALONE is the source of ALL the protestations against the Obama regime. Naturally, they feign surprise at the outrage....insinuating that this is a visceral hate movement led by well-organized conservative protestors and Republicans.


As one fellow TH poster stated yesterday on one of these threads: What we are witnessing, with the administration of Barack Hussein Obama, is the insurrection and willful destruction of our Republic by misguided, self-proclaimed revolutionaries left over from the '60s hippie drug culture movement, being unleashed upon this country. This is just the continuance of SDS, the old Black Panther movement, and Vietnam protest movements. Barack Obama and his czars represent all the elements who, for silly reasons of their own, are against "the establishment" demonized by the hippies and yippies of the '60s. Communism and collectivism is the golden calf they have nurtured and deluded themselves in thinking is superior to free-market capitalism.

Had their real motives been recognized by the celebrity worshipping idiots who voted for this radical...he would never have been elected in the first place.

They allowed themselves to be led into this with their blind eyes wide open.

Now, they are having to deal with the results of their being caught up in a cult of personality which threatens to reduce them from their cherished "middleclassness" to the poverty-generating insane elevation of socialist collectivism--Soviet-style.

You demoted God in your lives, and promoted Barack Hussein Obama as your god...deal with it.

Gibbs is right, it's "silly season" alright.

"Silly season" began during the last election cycle when too many Americans got caught up in the "feel good" idea of voting for a "celebrity" packaged candidate...

...all the while refusing to pay any attention whatsoever to the fact that THIS candidate, not only did not share American values...but abhorred the very Constitution in which they were enshrined.

Since being elected, Barack Obama has been unrelenting in his weird criticisms, denigrations, and visceral dislike of America and his arrogant talking down to voters is beginning to grate on the nerves of ALL Americans, not just conservatives who recognized him for what he was before he was elected.

Americans have found good reasons they don't want his speech to their children....THEY DON'T TRUST HIM!

And, although the writers and reporters in the state-run MSM, obvious sycophantic and devout supporters of Barack Hussein Obama and his leftist anti-God, anti-Christianity, and anti-American agenda, continue to try to skirt the issue of why THIS speech is meeting with so much resistance, the people have more sense than you would give them credit for having.

While you try to place blinders on the people, there are other sources for the truth that you have no willingness to either report on, nor explore. We don't trust YOU either.

It's not only "silly season" in the Obama White House...it's "silly season" in the newsrooms!

Not only does Obama and Gibbs think you're "silly" "angry mobs" and whatever other dismissive terms they can generate to describe anybody with the nerve to call them on their preposterous agenda...Their radical partners and propagandists in charge of the MSM think you're not only "silly" but "stupid" as well...and you are...if you believe they have ANY credibility left as "journalists."

Silly season, indeed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TO BLACK CHRISTIANS--IS OBAMA OUR SAUL?

 

ISRAEL ASKS FOR A KING, IS OBAMA OUR SAUL?

1Samuel 8-1- "When Samuel grew old, he appointed his sons as judges for Israel. (Vss. 3-20)-But his sons did not walk in his ways. They turned aside after dishonest gain and accepted bribes and perverted justice. So all the elders came to Samuel at Ramah. They said to him, "You are old, and your sons do not walk in your ways; now appoint a king to lead us, such as all the other nations have."

But when they said, "Give us a king to lead us," this displeased the LORD. And the LORD told him:
"Listen to all that have rejected, but they have rejected me as their king. As they have done from the day I brought them out of Egypt until this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so they are doing to you. Now listen to them; but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will do."

Samuel told all the words of the LORD to the people who were asking him for a king. He said,
"This is what the king who will reign over you will do: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. Your menservants and maidservants and the best of your cattle and donkeys he will take for his own use. He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, and the LORD will not answer you in that day."

But the people refused to listen to Samuel. "No!" they said.
"We want a king over us. Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles."

During the presidential campaign, I first became aware that black Christians had sold out their Christian values for the vainglory they succumbed to for the sake of having a black man (any black man) be elected President. Moreover, it soon became more alarmingly evident to me that such vanity wasn't merely limited to the average parishioners of these churches, but was supported, and even championed by their pastors. Many blacks who were loathe to look any further into who Barack Hussein Obama really was than that he was “one of us,” and claimed to be a church-going Christian, couldn’t help but begin to have sneaking suspicions, once sound clips of the goings on at Trinity United Church of God began to be made public, that something was definitely very un-Christian about the pastor of a church using the kind of radical and hateful rhetoric that Obama’s “Christian” pastor had been found to be making from the pulpit. In spite of that, and with the “blessings” of their own church leaders, these black “Christians” remained steadfast in their sycophantic support for “the black man.”

Like a swarm of angry killer bees, every so-called “leading black preacher” and politician rallied to the support of Jeremiah Wright, providing excuses and explanations for his blasphemous ranting under the cover of “the black” church and its role in the community as being unappreciated by white people. There was never any question about Wright’s claim: 
“GodD**n America…that’s in the Bible!” Therefore, there was nothing (according to the silence coming out of the black church) un-Christian about such hate-filled “sermonizing.” They knew what Wright was teaching and preaching was anything but Christian, but they denied it; those sitting in the pews, and those standing in the pulpits.

Black “leaders” and pundits were interviewed by the Obama media (NBC, CBS, ABC, and PBS) to explain the context by which Rev. Wright should be understood as simply symbolic and typical of the best of the “Black Church Experience.”

Democrat strategist, Donna Brazile, as a panelist on ABC’s Sunday morning talk show, This Week with George Stephanopoulos, was one of the most egregious apologists for the damnable behavior of the anything-but-Christian comments and sermons of Jeremiah Wright; willingly, by her comments, throwing the entire community of African-American churches under the Obama/Wright bus. After one particular appearance of hers on a Sunday morning, I was compelled to email to her (and to post on my Townhall blog) a response to her profane statements tying ALL black Christian churches to Jeremiah Wright by claiming on This Week with George Stephanopoulos on ABC March 16, 2008 “Wright [is] one of the more moderate black preachers.” The first paragraph of that letter: “An Open Letter to Donna Brazile” reads like this:

“To The Dishonorable Ms. Donna Brazile

That you would go on a Sunday morning talk show and sacrifice the reputation of the entire community of pastors of black American churches in a desperate attempt to save face for Barack Obama and his crazy, race-baiting, America-hating pastor, is LOWDOWN. How could you fix your mouth to tell that LIE on national television; that Jeremiah Wright is typical of the African-American church when he stands in the pulpit and curses, "God**n America"? You are a liar. I have been active in the African-American church for 48 years, and I have never heard, nor would countenance, such blasphemy coming out of the mouth of a preacher on Sunday morning and from the pulpit. Where is Jesus or the Holy Spirit amidst all this anger and hatred? Not in Trinity! Jeremiah Wright attempts to draw a parallel between America and the Rome of Jesus' day. Did Jesus curse the Romans? Did He pray for God to damn them? Or did He sacrifice His life to save all of us from the wrath of God, the Romans too?”

The Dallas Morning News ran a story on its website on March 19, 2008:


“Dallas-area black clergy defend Rev. Jeremiah Wright's message”

“The Rev. Jeremiah Wright's fiery commentary about America went beyond the usual political discourse but reflected long-held frustrations that African-Americans often release at churches and other social settings, local black pastors say.

Many black Dallas pastors view Mr. Wright as a longtime hero and mentor, defending his message and bridling at what they call media misrepresentation of it.

"I have preached at Trinity [Mr. Wright's church in Chicago] and he has preached here," said the Rev. Tyrone Gordon, pastor at St. Luke Community United Methodist Church in Dallas. "One thing I said to the church on this past Sunday is that a lot of us are taking it personally because it is an attack on the whole black prophetic experience.” [Unquote]

My personal response to this as a black man having been involved in the church for nearly 48 years—“…please…”

Again quoting that same article:

Mr. Obama tried to shed light on Tuesday.

"Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear," Mr. Obama said Tuesday.
"The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and, yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America."

The denials continued as Barack Hussein Obama, the supporter of Infanticide, member of a racist theology, and student of godless Marxism, was ALONE given a pass to quote Scripture and cite the teachings of Christ with impunity and black Christian approval.

Mr. Obama was the only candidate in the race who was given a pass as he openly incorporated direct references to the Holy Bible scripture in his speeches and campaign appearances, including Matthew 25, and made references to the teachings of Jesus Christ on being one's "brother's keeper" and "as ye have done unto the least of these," even though both of these scriptures expose the height of his own hypocrisy as he is neither his brother's keeper [his brother being ignored by him as he lives in Kenya on $1 per month], nor is he concerned about "the least of these" [innocent live-born babies whose mothers want to screw but don't want to be "punished" with the consequences of their screwing].

Since being elected into office, Barack Hussein Obama has taken on the role of a Crusader; but against Christianity, and Christian values!!
One of the first acts he signed after taking office was to rescind the ban that President George W. Bush had placed on U.S. taxpayer's money to fund overseas abortions. "The Mexico City Policy," which was instituted by Ronald Reagan and reinstated by George W. Bush after the Clinton years, banned U.S. taxpayer dollars from funding international organizations that provide or promote abortion.

The anti-life assault begins

The election of Barack Obama as president, Catholic Insight stated in a November 3, 2008 press release, would turn out to be a disaster for the advance of a pro-life culture.

On the most important cultural issue of all, the equality and dignity of all human beings before God, President Obama represents the greatest threat today. His leadership is being hailed as a sign of hope across the world and welcomed with open arms. He has a 100 per cent approval rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America, the U.S.'s leading pro-abortion organization. That rating is based on a record of consistently voting against the unborn.

Obama has told Planned Parenthood he regards so-called choice as "a fundamental issue" on which he will not yield. He voted against an Induced Infant Liability Act in the Illinois legislature in 2002; this would have given legal protection and medical assistance to babies born from botched abortions. He also voted against banning partial-birth abortion in the Senate in October 2007.

Inauguration

January 20, 2009 Barack Obama is sworn in as president of the United States of America. His original birth certificate is not available. He calls himself a "person of faith," without specifying what faith he means. It is not Christianity as founded by Jesus and entrusted to his Apostles.

In his inaugural address, Obama neglects to mention the American founders' emphasis on life and liberty as the first of the inalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence. Five minutes after Obama becomes president, the White House website changes from pro-life to pro-abortion.

Policies

January 21 The president is at work selecting members of his staff and cabinet while Congress, where Democrats have a majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, sets to work developing policies and legislation to advance the agnostic-atheist attack on the Judeo-Christian foundations of law and order.

In Congress, Obama receives assistance from numerous Catholic politicians who have scuttled Catholic moral teaching in favor of "political correctness," i.e., various aspects of modern hedonism and the culture of death. While the overriding focus of attention during the first 50 days is the economy, the bailout of banks, various "stimulus" packages and the housing credit and unemployment crises, the anti-life agenda was set in motion from the beginning.

President Barack Obama got busy striking down barriers to abortions as soon as he stepped through the doors of the White House. Here is just a small list showing how fast he started putting his agenda to work:

January 23 Obama overturns, by executive order, the Mexico City Policy of previous presidents that forbade the funding of abortions and abortion groups outside U.S. boundaries. (No TV cameras or press were present for the signing on a late Friday afternoon when news services were shut down. Hundreds of millions of dollars will go to support abortions in poor countries, especially in Asia, Africa and South America.)

- Appended to the statement announcing the end of the Mexico City Policy, Obama declared: "In addition, I look forward to working with Congress to restore U.S. financial support for the UN Population Fund." (That funding was halted in 2002 when a State Department investigation showed the Fund supported China's coercive one-child-per- family policy through forced abortions and sterilizations.)

January 27 A Congressional committee debates the Prevention First Act (PFA), which, if passed, would hand over millions for "family planning" methods, attack freedom of conscience rights for health providers and financially pave the way for the proposed Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), which would strip all states of the ability to restrict abortions and homosexual activism. The Prevention First Act was introduced by Senate Democrat majority leader Harry Reid (Mormon, pro-abortion) on January 6, 2009. The act claims to reduce unintended pregnancies and abortion and is based on the premise that contraception prevents abortion. (In reality, contraception is the gateway to abortion.)

- Susan Rice, Obama's new ambassador to the UN, pledges support for the convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). Already, the CEDAW committee has tried to bully 93 countries into making abortion legal.

- The administrator of the USAID foreign assistance program, pro-lifer Kent Hill, is replaced with Alonzo Fulgham, the CEO of the agency, who announces that the reversal of the Mexico City Policy is being implemented immediately. Fulgham issues a formal notice informing field offices worldwide.

- The director of the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), pro-abortion Thoraya Obaid (Saudi Arabia), welcomes Obama's restoration of $50 million to the UNFPA's coffers and its coercive population control plans. "Access to reproductive health (a code word for contraception, sterilization and abortion) is the core of equality for women and girls," she says. The funding had been suspended since 2002.

January 29 The UN children's agency UNICEF launches its annual report, stating: "Having a child remains one of the biggest health risks for women worldwide." It recommends global financing for "family planning" and "reproductive health services" as the primary way to reduce maternal deaths. It then admits that the statistics on worldwide annual deaths are subject "to a high degree of uncertainty."

- The Democrat-led Senate, by a 59-39 vote, rejects national medical coverage in the SCHIP program for unborn children and their pregnant mothers. This, pro-life sources say, will lead to more abortions.

February 5 Obama's new group of 24 faith-based advisors includes Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Washington-based Religious Action Centre of Reform Judaism, which was a sponsor of a 2004 pro-abortion march by Planned Parenthood and NARAL. Other pro-abortion members are added later.

February 6 The Senate refuses to remove a discrimination clause against the religious use of university facilities benefiting from the stimulus bill.

February 19 The federal government is drafting guidelines that will be put in place once Obama approves federal funds for embryonic stem cell research.

February 25 As feared by pro-life groups, the Omnibus Appropriations Bill cuts funding for abstinence education by $54 million, while giving more money to Planned Parenthood programs. This leaves only $95 million for national programs. This money disappears later on.

- Time magazine, in attacking opponents of the FOCA bill, is accused of many inaccuracies, non-sequiturs and misrepresentations. Time has described the bill as "mythical." Yet, Obama announced his intentions to sign such a bill in 2006, again in a July 2007 speech to Planned Parenthood and once more on January 22, 2008 on the Roe v. Wade anniversary.

February 27 The Obama administration prepares to rescind conscience rules for health care workers. Obama officials tell the Chicago Tribune that, for the Provider Conscience Law and other regulations protecting medical personnel against involvement in abortions, they are opening a 30-day public comment period, after which they will rescind the law. Pro-abortion groups have long desired to coerce all medical personnel and hospitals into providing contraception and sterilizations and committing abortions. As one writer put it, "This is a declaration of war on all who oppose the killing of the unborn."

March 4 The president has begun consulting his top defense advisors on how to lift a ban on gays serving openly in the military.

March 5 The Senate, by a 55-39 vote, rejects an amendment to stop funds from going to the United Nations Population Fund.

March 6 Obama shuts out pro-life groups from attending today's White House health care summit, called to discuss how health care reform should be implemented. Pro-abortion groups like Planned Parenthood, however, are invited to attend. Planned Parenthood's president, Cecile Richards, called for including access to abortion in any health care reform plan.

- U.S. bishops launch e-mail campaign to "maintain widely-supported pro-life policies" and oppose FOCA (Freedom of Choice Act). It is a follow-up to the postcard campaign begun in January.

March 9 Obama eliminates eight-year-old limits on federal money for the use of embryonic stem cells for research - which kills newly conceived embryos - by presidential decree, in a room packed with scientists. "As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for each other and work to ease human suffering," the President said, (forgetting that human embryos are killed in the process).

Nowhere in the world has embryonic stem-cell research produced a single therapy or treatment. Meanwhile, adult stem-cell research has over 70 therapies to its credit so far. The President's Executive Order also removes the HHS Secretary's duty to pursue funding for adult stem-cell research.

- This ends ability of pro-abortionists, including President Obama, to say they are "pro-choice" because they no longer allow health officials a choice to oppose or disapprove.

- The HHS administration announces the intention to abolish the "final rule" (protection of conscience for health workers opposed to abortion, contraception, IVF, etc).

It should be noted at this point, that ALL Republican-proposed amendments to protect health workers and hospitals opposed to being forced to provide abortions under a nationalized healthcare plan, being proposed for inclusion in the current $1.5 trillion dollar Obama "Healthcare Bill" being rushed through Congressional passage, have been rejected and voted down by Democrats who hold the majority, and therefore, have enough votes to kill all Republican attempts to include such protection! If this "socialized federal government-run healthcare" passes, for the 1st time in American history (and from now on) NO healthcare worker will be allowed NOT to participate in providing & performing abortions!

Summary

The facts of the first 50 days of the Obama presidency seem overwhelming. According to the 55-page pro-abortion document, "Advancing Reproductive Rights and Health in a New Administration," $4.5 billion in federal funding will be disbursed at home and abroad to "advance reproductive rights." This document is posted on , Obama's official website for his transition team.

Obama's Steps for the First 100 Days projects the end of the Mexico City Policy, the Hyde Amendment, the Kemp-Kasten Amendment, the Weldon Amendment, restrictions on emergency contraception (Plan B), the termination of all abstinence-only programs and a reversal of the recent HHS regulation protecting pro-life physicians and institutions. By Day 50, many of these had been accomplished already. Any present obstacles to so-called abortion rights not covered by removing these restrictions, such as the ban on partial birth abortion and state laws requiring parental notification, will be covered by the passage of the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) or perhaps by many acts or regulations each embodying one particular aspect.

I draw the attention especially to the coercion which is built into many of these measures. A combined United States-United Nations assault on the freedom of poor countries to determine their own domestic policies on population is already underway.

At home, the Obama regime will take on more abusive, tyrannical features as it seeks to destroy the rights of people to disagree and dissent. All along, this has been the implication of the new legislated rights to kill and to overthrow the natural moral law in family and sexual matters introduced 40 years ago.

The president and his advisors will be making some 7,000 appointments that will influence policy; they will be pro-abortion ones, said one commentator, with the exception being the ambassador to the Vatican. What resistance the Christian community will be able to offer remains to be seen.

March 10 The end of the first 50 days. Except for publicity about the new financing of stem cell research and a mention of the overturning of the Mexico City Policy, adoring liberal daily newspapers have not mentioned Obama's new Death Culture.

March 11 The Obama administration opens an e-mail address for public comments to respond to the decision to dump the Provider Conscience Clause. The e-mail window will close on April 9, after which a simple Executive Order can eliminate the protective shield against discrimination for pro-life health care personnel.

- Obama establishes a White House Council on Women and Girls and appoints pro-abortion Chicago lawyer Tina Tchen as Executive Director. Tchen served as Vice-President of NOW (National Organization for Women). The new Council will examine all federal laws to see how they affect women, especially from the point of view of feminist "rights" supporters.

March 12 The United Nations Annual Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) meeting continues in New York. The US delegation (Ellen Chester) states that "sexual and reproductive health and rights" will be a priority with them from now on. Their delegation considers abortion to be part of "reproductive health," even though in the past that interpretation was voted down by the majority.

- The Obama administration publishes a proposal in the Federal Register to rescind the pro-life protections for health care personnel in it’s entirely.

- The Senate stimulus bill contains a bailout package for Planned Parenthood.
- The Democrat-led Senate rejects by a 55-39 vote an amendment to stop US taxpayer funding of the UNFPA. The UNFPA backs policies of forced abortion and sterilizations, as in China.

March 17 President Obama's first federal judicial nominee (to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals) is pro-abortion US district Judge David Hamilton. The President is also bringing back the judicial reviews of the American Bar Association whose members regularly take a pro-abortion stand.


March 24 All during these weeks the media's entire attention is drawn to the President's economic measures running into the trillions of dollars. Barely a word about the "other" cultural agenda filters through in the media.

March 26 A mandatory national (Obama) youth corps is called for in GIVE (Generations Immigrating Volunteerism and Education Act - H.R. 1388) passed by the House (321-105) and by Senate (79-19). Note: In the USA, classroom indoctrination is now found in "Hate" and "Sexual diversity" training in 3, 500 units by Lesbian Straight Education Network (GSLEN).

March 27 In Mexico Hillary Clinton states that emphasizing and promoting abortion is a key issue in President Obama's foreign policy from now on. Clinton received the Margaret Sanger award from the abortionist Planned Parenthood group, two days after she visited the Catholic Lady of Guadalupe shrine in Mexico.

March 28 Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Dem) approves of including abortion in national health plan.

March 30 House of Representatives, with only eight nay votes, passed Bill H.R. 20 (S 304). It requires all new mothers, their spouses and children, to be evaluated for post-partum depression. This Mother's Act seeks to re-classify the natural process of pregnancy and birth as a mental disorder requiring psychiatric treatment and medication. The bill is promoted by the pharmacy industry.

- Another new bill introduced is the Prevention First Act (H.R. 463), promoted by Louise Slaughter (D., Rochester N.Y.). It requires all hospitals receiving federal funds to provide "emergency contraception," and all insurance plans to provide coverage for contraception.

- State Department's new top legal advisor is Harold Koh, pro-abortionist, until now Yale Law School Dean; "trans nationalist," i.e., he believes that American law and values must give way to current international trends, as they do in Europe. For example, Sharia law should apply in America. This office shapes foreign policy in the Courts and in international treaties. He is also Obama's first choice to fill an opening in the Supreme Court.

April 2 An amendment to keep the rights of conscience and protections for health care providers was defeated in the Senate, 56-41. Sixteen Catholic Senators (out of 25) voted against it, despite appeals by Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, president of the US Bishops Conference, and Rockville Bishop William Murphy to support it.

- These individuals included: Mark Begich (D., Alaska), Chris Dodd (D., Conn.), Ted Kaufman (D., Del.), Richard Durbin(D., Ill.), Tom Harkin (D., Iowa), Mary Landrieu (D., La), Susan Collins (R., Maine), Barbara Mikulski (D., Md.), John Kerry(D., Mass.), Claire McCaskill (D., Mo.), Robert Menendez (D., N.J.), Kristen Gillibrand (D., N.J.), Jack Reed (D., R.I.), Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.), Maria Cantwell (D., Wash.), and Patty Murray (D., Wash.).

- The nine Catholic senators who voted for the amendment were: Lisa Murkowski (R., Alaska), Mel Martinez (R., Fla.), Jim Risch (R., Idaho), Sam Brownback (R., Kansas), Jim Bunning (R., Ky.), Dave Vitter (R., La.), Mike Johanns (R., Neb.), George Voinovich (R., Ohio), and Robert Casey (D., Pa.).

- The Obama administration is now free to repeal the protections by Executive Order.

- Nina Fedoroff, advisor to Hillary Clinton, claims the world faces overpopulation.

April 7 President Obama, speaking in Turkey: "We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation." He also stated: "We convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world-including in my own country." Comment by George Neumayr: Obama expresses his deep sympathy for Islam and his rejection of Christianity. His enemy is not Islam abroad but Christianity at home.

April 8 Vatican informally rejects three suggested Obama ambassadors over their pro-abortion views. Vatican denies all. Insiders give names such as Prof Kmiec and Caroline Kennedy.

April 9 Time for objecting to the overthrow of Provider Conscience Regulation ends. A national poll of Americans finds a strong majority (87%) want to keep protections in place. 340, 000 people had sent e-mails.

- President Obama has nominated pro-abortion Ron Welch as Assistant Attorney-General for legislative affairs. He will also participate in the Senate confirmation process for federal judges and US attorneys.

- The President signs executive order for embryonic stem-cell research under the slogan "science should triumph ideology."

April 14 Pro-life advocates try to derail the Senate confirmation of Governor Kathleen Sebelius as HHS Secretary because of her strong support for abortion, including late term abortions (she is later confirmed..

April 15 The Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of Homeland Security (Secretary Janet Napolitano), issues nine-page report, which registers the pro-life movement among "right-wing extremism in the Unites States." Those concerned call the document "outrageous," describing the tying of conservatives and opponents of abortion to foreign terrorists as a radical deceit.

April 16 Mexico City. Speaking on protecting the so-called right of women to choose abortion, President Obama stated:"…[W]e must work to find common ground to expand access to affordable contraception, accurate health information and prevention services."

- Defense Secretary Robert Gates states that the Obama administration will move cautiously in shifting policies to accepting homosexual activists serving in the military.

April 17 HHS Secretary Janet Napolitano apologizes for footnote tying opponents of abortion to terrorists. Pro-lifers are angry about this smear tactic tried earlier in the State of Missouri.

- The media remain exclusively concerned with: economic bailouts, credit cards, President Obama's foreign policy (reaching out to Cuba, Venezuela), CIA policies, the use of torture, Bank of America's underhandedness, and automobile rescues and management.

April 22 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will not appeal the ruling of federal judge Edward Korman that the MAP (Morning After Pill) be made available to 17-year-olds without prescription.

April 23 Secretary of the State Hillary Clinton admits before the House Foreign Relations Committee that as far as the new government is concerned, the term "reproductive health" includes abortion. "The Obama government will promote abortions overseas." "We are now an Administration that will protect the rights of women," she also added: "The 20thCentury reproductive rights movement, really embodied in the life and leadership of Margaret Sanger, was one of the most transformational in the entire history of the human race."
(Note: Margaret Sanger was a radical eugenicist and racist of the 1920's and the 1930's who lived and worked in New York City and promoted abortion as a means of controlling the population of black babies being born in America through Planned Parenthood).

- The Administration's new International Ambassador, Melanne Verveer, White House Director for Foreign Women's issues, confirmed President Obama's commitment to population control as outlined, she claimed, at the UN Population Conference in Cairo 15 years ago.

April 29 The President urges Congress to pass federal "hate crimes" legislation (H.R. 1913) "to protect citizens from violent acts of intolerance." The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Act of 2009 grants the federal government authority to punish crimes that appear to be motivated by "hatred" of a person's sexual orientation. H.R. 1913 "serves only to punish individuals for the beliefs, opinions or convictions held at the time an act is committed" (Liberty University law professor Shawn Akers). " As such H.R. 1913 does not punish criminal intent, but criminalizes thought." The House approved H.R. 1913 and voted 249-175 for the inclusion of sexual orientation as a protected right. Here, as in other countries, no definition of sexual orientation is provided.
(This bill, by the way, is currently being introduced for passage by Senate Majority leader, Harry Reid.) If passed, this law will open the door for pastors, and others, to be arrested and charged with "hate crimes" for preaching against homosexuality.

April 30 Abortion advocate Nancy Keenan, President of NARAL, "celebrates" the end of the first 100 days of the Obama Administration as a "milestone in these challenging times."

- Freedom of speech, thought and religion are now under attack. False "rights" are about to triumph. The Culture of Death is seeking to destroy the Culture of Life. In this it will fail because of the secret power on the side of Life, which will conquer even despite the mass apostasy of its Protestant and Catholic Christian followers.

Sources: Americans for Truth; the American Life League; the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute; the Culture of Life Foundation; LifeNews.com; LifeSiteNews.com; the National Post; the Population Research Institute; Time; United Families.org; The Wanderer; WorldNetDaily.com, Zenit.org.

Father Alphonse de Valk is a historian by profession and presently the editor of Catholic Insight magazine.


On another key issue, the integrity of the traditional American family, in 2004 Obama called the Defense of Marriage Act an "abhorrent law" and added: "The repeal of DOMA is essential ... For the record, I opposed DOMA in 1996. It should be repealed and I will vote for its repeal on the Senate floor. I will also oppose any proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban gays and lesbians from 'marrying.'"

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 15, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) -
Senate Democrats announced on Monday that the Senate would consider a homosexual "hate crimes" proposal as an attached amendment to the annual defense authorization bill, and will likely vote on the bill tomorrow.

In addition to adding "sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability" to the list of federally-protected classes, S.909, also known as the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, also expands the reach of hate crimes law by eliminating the restriction that such crimes disrupt federally protected activities.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said Monday he would introduce S.909 as a bipartisan amendment to the defense authorization measure, thereby easing passage of the hotly debated bill.

Last year the Senate approved hate crimes legislation also as part of the military bill, but it was never reconciled with a similar House-passed bill, and met with opposition from the Bush White House. However, Obama expressed support for the legislation in April, urging the House to quickly pass its version.

Critics have warned that the bill is bound to chill religious free speech against homosexuality, saying that similar laws in other countries have facilitated the prosecution of Christians who criticize homosexuality, particularly in Canada and the U.K.


In his every action as President, Barack Hussein Obama has rejected and undermined Christian values and their influence and authority in America, since being elected. He even went so far in his most recent speech to Muslims to state that "America can be considered to be one to the largest Muslim countries in the world." This, after making the earlier statement that, "America is not a Christian nation..."

He is the only President in American history that has bowed to a Saudi king and kissed his hand; and when he refers to the Quran he calls it "The Holy Quran."

May 7, 2009-National Prayer Day. Every President has been a part of this day since 1952. But yet this year Obama was not a part of this.

"We are disappointed in the lack of participation by the Obama administration," Shirley Dobson, chairwoman of the National Day of Prayer Committee, said in a statement. "At this time in our country's history, we would hope our president would recognize more fully the importance of prayer."

Some evangelicals said they were not surprised by Mr. Obama's decision.

"For those of us who have our doubts about Obama's faith, no, we did not expect him to have the service," said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America. "But as president, he should put his own lack of faith aside and live up to the office."

Referencing a remark the president made at a recent press conference in Turkey that Americans "do not consider ourselves a Christian nation," she added: "That was projecting his own beliefs, but not reflecting what the majority of Americans feel. It's almost like Obama is trying to remake America into his own image. This is not a rejection of Shirley Dobson; it's a rejection of the concept that America is a spiritual nation and its foundation is Judeo-Christian."

This is complete lack of respect by the President. He can take time out of his day to go eat a burger on air so we know if he likes ketchup or mustard(who cares) but yet he can't be a part of AMERICAN TRADITION. In fact, Barack Obama has proven nothing but complete disdain for this country and it's values since day one. I, personally, cannot recall his having said one good thing about America. In every one of his overseas speeches he disparages American contributions and apologizes for what he perceives as it's injustices. It has come to be somewhat expected every time he speaks in a foreign country, especially those that are either Islamic or Communist.

Yet even today, black Christian pastors and their congregants are determined to ignore all of this. Some black churches have even gone so far as to erect "altars" to Barack Hussein Obama on their church bulletin boards. One can hardly step foot into a black church without seeing some display of Obama-worship; photographs, newspaper clippings, and such posted on the walls of the church.

Even now, black pastors and their members pretend to not see what is happening, and the war that is being waged against Christians, right here in this country, and that it is being led by none other than Barack Hussein Obama himself. And since there is no outcry from among the heathens who run the media in this country; all the reporting being geared towards aiding Obama and the Democrat agenda to completely "remake' this country into something more resembling of Sodom and Gomorrah than the God-fearing country it once was, they continue to pretend not to see. They fear the wrath that will come from their criticizing the black "Saul" Obama, more than they fear the wrath of God for the sin of omission they are guilty of for not speaking out against his anti-Christian policies. So they go along, to get along.

Those who have no respect for either the authority of the Holy Bible, or the great preachers that preach it, have no problem with its messages being bastardized and usurped by one who is intent on distorting its message to fit their reprobate culture of death and homosexuality being elevated to a respectable lifestyle deserving of “marriage rights”…

...and their Mainstream Media leg-tingling Fifth Column is all-too-eager to promote this blasphemy; turning a blind eye and a gleeful accommodation to the destruction of all things we as Christians hold sacred.

... But for black people who have read the Bible, understand the commandments of God, and have called themselves devoted Christians for their entire adult lives, there is no excuse that stands up to the scrutiny of God's words, and that does not expose their hypocrisy at remaining silent on these issues.

Despite all of the evidence about the true character of this “black man” that contradicted all that the Word of God makes clear, and instead of living their Christian principles when it meant the most, many black pastors and the members of their congregations failed to side with Christ when they put all their faith in a man and made Barack Hussein Obama (because of his being a “black man”) their Golden Calf—their Saul—their graven image.

And as he continues now to show his true colors, some of these same black pastors and the members of their congregations are coming to awaken to the awful and damning truth that in supporting this apostate politician, they supported to assuage the lusts of their personal and carnal banality, they, indeed, allowed color and racial vanity to trump their pretense of following the principles of Christianity.

But to look at some of their faces today, one can see the guilt and shame that some of them are now feeling as we all witness the destruction he is wreaking upon this nation, and the outright contempt he has for all Christian Americans; not just white ones. I can see it in their eyes. They know that the Truth of God’s Word was speaking out against him and exposing him all along the way.

"The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness..."--Romans 1:18
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IRANIAN PROTESTERS TO OBAMA--"YOU FRAUD!!"

 
Barack Obama's wimpy Cairo speech to Muslims has absolutely nothing to do with inspiring the uprisings taking place in the streets of Tehran right now.

Barack Hussein Obama's
contribution to changing anything in the Middle East has long blown away in clouds of hot air and a long ago set of packed up and cooled-down teleprompters-powered by a small amount of electricity and a much more copious amount of hyperbole. 
 
Barack Hussein Obama, today, is showing the Iranians protesting their government's cheating them out of their chances for freedom that he has nothing to offer but overblown rhetoric and insincere lip service.

It is interesting that the liberal leftists who have made their careers on deriding the policies of the Bush/Cheney administration for having the audacity to do more than just make speeches in the Middle East want to somehow associate Barack Obama's Cairo Islamic apologist and appeasment speech as being responsible for emboldening Iranian citizens' rising up against the regime of Ahmadinajad and the results of their fraudulent election. 

If you want to really know how conditions have gotten to the point where Iranian civilians are rioting in the streets over their stolen election, and their hunger for a taste of liberty, you will need to take a realistic and sober look at the conditions that provided them the stimulus (no pun intended) to have the anger and the courage to come out and speak out in the manner they are doing now.

After the failure of Colin Powell's resolve to finish Desert Storm the first Gulf War by continuing until Saddam Hussein was ousted from leadership, and the subsequent  years of violations of the cease-fire agreement, followed by the many useless U.N. resolutions condemning Saddam's open refusals to abide by them, President George W.Bush, after the devasting attacks of September 11, 2001 did more than talk a good game and defer to yet more useless United Nations Security Counsel resolutions. He had the guts to take action.

Today, it seems the only action Barack Hussein Obama is willing to take concerning the situation in Iran is the jacking of his jaws until the $h!t begins to hit the fan.

What liberals in the American Obama-worshipping media and elsewhere refuse to admit (and in their dishonesty, never will) is that if President George W. Bush would had never had the courage and leadership to go into Iraq and complete the job of liberating the Iraqi people and their cowering neighbors in the rest of the world from the tyranny of dictator Saddam Hussein and his sadistic sons, the people of Iran would not be now in the streets wanting and feeling and demonstrating for what they feel they deserve: the same chance for democracy and liberation in their country that President Bush's America brought to Iraq.

They are looking at their neighbor Iraq, and they want the same thing for themselves: FREEDOM!

As President, George W. Bush never once offered to sit down and negotiate a way to appease Ahmadamnjihad and the mullahs. He threatened to kick their butts, just like he did Saddam Hussein,  if they ever got close to achieving a nuclear bomb! Ahmadamnjihad, and the mullahs, knew they would get exactly the same thing Saddam Hussein got if they crossed a certain line! And the people of Iran were silently hoping he would do the same for them as he did for Iraq.

The scene you see in the streets of Iran today was set up by the strength of George W. Bush's administration to fight Islamic tyrannical and extremist governments, not to give them lip service like Barack Hussein Obama.

President Barack Hussein Obama is more concerned with waging his war against the United States Constitution, America's small businesses, the American taxpaying middle-class, and Americans themselves than he is fighting anyone in the Middle East. As President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama is ignoring what is happening in Iran as he is too busy running around the country now with the same old song he always sings when he's getting ready to put another shaft in the American taxpayer's @$$--"I've got more important things to do right now, like taking over the private health care industry and I've got to do it now! or we'll have a catastrophe! Give me more control over every aspect of the economy and your lives or the country will not survive! We can't afford to not spend another trillion dollars to save the taxpayers more money?" 

Barack Hussein Obama has got a lot of courage when it comes to putting a foot up the taxpayer's rear end! But all he's shown since descending from the heavens to work out his magic on America is an open mouth, extended hand, and a standing invitation to Ahmadamnjihad on Ahmadamnjihad?s terms. "Hey, it's alright if they develop nuclear power. They've got a right to it."

What the leftists will never admit is that if it hadn't been for Bush's "meddling" in the Middle East, there would be no public hew and cry taking place in Iran now!

They will also never admit that right now President George W. Bush is more popular to the people of Iran than Barack Hussein Obama!! And always has been!! There are students in those riots holding up signs right now with photographs of Barack Obama's face on them with the word: FRAUD emblazoned on them! You won't see any of your mainstream media pundits reporting on this!

Living up to his White House creed, "Never let a good crisis go to waste," Barack Hussein Obama and his gang are using the opportunity of the suffering of the good people of Iran to try to push through their Socialist Health Care takeover on the American people. The only war worth fighting to Barack Hussein Obama, is the one he is waging against you and me!
 
The strongest statement of outrage the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, can muster while this tragedy unfolds is:

"It is up to Iranians to make decisions about who Iran's leaders will be. We respect Iranian sovereignty and want to avoid the United States being the issue inside of Iran."

"What I would say to those people who put so much hope and energy and optimism into the political process, I would say to them that the world is watching and inspired by their participation, regardless of what the ultimate outcome of the election was."
 
Gee...that took a lot of courage.

If any good thing comes out of all this it will be that the citizens of Iran who are yearning for freedom and help from the Americans have seen, sooner rather than later, that it's current leadership under Barack Hussein Obama doesn't give a damn about helping anybody but Barack Hussein Obama and their Islamic oppressors.

While they're bleeding in the streets waiting on a response from U. S. President Barack Hussein Obama, he'll be too busy putting all his attention and energy on beating up on American citizens, putting down his own opposition, and bleeding us dry.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CIA DIRECTOR LEON PANETTA-WHIMPERINGS OF AN ABJECT COWARD


The overt propaganda arm of the Democrat Party (AP) has found a new gem of incredible stupidity and banal abjuration of all sane discourse by which to provide cover for the naked ignorance being perpetrated from the administration of Barack Hussein Obama and its dangerous daliances with the pre-911 mentality that is reinstituting the same policies that led to the September 11, 2001 disaster.

In the Associated Press' latest bullyrag on Conservatve opinion, the headline reads:

Sunday, June 14, 2009

 AP News reports, as news: "CIA Director Leon Panetta says former Vice President Dick Cheney's criticism of the Obama administration's approach to terrorism almost suggests "he's wishing that this country would be attacked again, in order to make his point."

Panetta told The New Yorker for an article in its June 22 issue that Cheney "smells some blood in the water" on the issue of national security"
_____________________________________________


The Whimperings of an Abject Coward

This is the kind of pap coming out of the Obama administration and its propaganda arm, the Associated Press.  It is ludicrous for anyone to suggest that Dick Cheney, a man Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrat left would like to see put on trial for being "overzealous" in PROTECTING America by using what Barack Hussein Obama and the left characterize as "torture," to NOW be accused by the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency of hoping that America is attacked because Barack Hussein Obama's policies of coddling terrorists is, in Cheney's opinion, making America less safe.

This asinine and juvenile "whining" is just the latest attempt to divert the scrutiny from Obama's  kowtowing apologizing and extremely naive and dangerous policies of Muslim appeasement and wishful thinking, to bastardizing the motives of those who point out the insanity of Barack Hussein Obama's policies and lack of reasoned leadership decisions .

CIA Director Leon Panetta, rather than having the integrity, balls, or both, to stand up and tell Obama that he agrees with Cheney's warnings, is now taking the tact of blaming Cheney, in case of further attacks, as WISHING them upon America.

This is a shill and further highlights the level to which Democrats and liberals will stoop to vilify anyone who dares object to the destructive and dangerous, unqualified, and astonishingly naive Islamic appeaser we are now suffering in the nation's White House.

All CIA Director Leon Panetta is revealing is that he himself is a COWARD!

It won't be Cheney's WISHING that will result in another attack, and Panetta knows that as well as anyone. If ANYTHING, it will be Panetta's ineptitude and cowardice in failing to tell Obama the truth about the calamitous direction his appeasement policies are taking; in having CIA agents, FBI agents, and soldiers on the battlefield to treat enemy combatants by reading them Miranda rights! Can you imagine a Marine or soldier telling an Islamic terrorist combatant caught setting a roadside bomb in Afghanistan "You have the right to remain silent?"

All Panetta is providing is his tacit admission that there will likely be more terrorist attacks down the road with the course Obama is leading us on; make no mistake about it.

If all the undermining of President Bush and our troops on the battlefield under the Democrats and liberals during his administration didn't cause any terrorist attacks, how in the world is Vice-president Cheney's support for stronger measures for protecting the American people, and keeping dangerous Islamic terrorist suspects in Guantanamo and off American soil, WISHING for an attack?

If one would take into account all the rantings and press releases heard around the world of Jack Murtha, John Kerry, Dick Durbin, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and all the other Democrats in Congress calling our soldiers and Marines "Nazis," "Murderers," "terrorizing women and children in the dark of night," saying "the war is lost," calling Gen. Petraeus a "liar," calling our troops actions as being the same as the actions of Pol Pot in Cambodia, and calling Pres. Bush and vice-Pres. Cheney "war criminals" at the height of the war in Iraq; how would that NOT be considered, by Panetta's reasoning, their WISHING for another terrorist attack, OR WORSE, that we suffered a complete defeat at the hands of the Islamic terrorists and Al Qaeda that we were fighting?

Did the previous Director of CIA, under Bush, George Tenet, go crying to the media to say that these "leaders" were almost WISHING for another terrorist attack with THEIR comments condemning, not only the President's policies, but the TROOPS themselves who were risking their lives on the battlefield?

Vice-president Cheney is simply voicing the opinion that many Americans share, and history has PROVEN to be true! You cannot reason with people who hold it as their destiny and duty to bring about your annihilation!

 
Since when did speaking out in defense of one's country having a strong resolve to protect its citizens become dangerous to those citizens, and WISHING for them to be attacked?

Vice-president CHENEY has already proven his resolve to keep America safe and he succeeded; much to the chagrin of Obama and Leon Panetta who would like to see him punished for doing such a good job of it!

For Panetta to turn that around now, in the face of what is clearly the Obama administration's almost maniacal attempts to return to a pre-911 mentality that would embarrass even Bill Clinton, and make such a facetious accusation, is farcical at best and an indication of his being over his head, in running our nation's Central Intelligence Agency, at worst!

This is tantamount to Winston Churchill being considered as WISHING for Britain to be attacked by his warning English leaders of his day that any attempts to avoid going to war with Hitler's Germany could not be realized by a policy of appeasement!

Panetta's comments are nothing more than the whimperings of a coward and a man who knows that he is out of his depth to protect us; having himself been handcuffed by the limitations set on CIA agents by his master,  the Muslim-appeaser-in-chief, Barack Hussein Obama.

Leon Panetta's comments are a cover for his own impotency, and a desperate attempt to shoot the messenger; to fire the whistleblower; and to divert attention from the reality of his unsustainable situation.

It won't be Dick Cheney's WISHING for another attack that will be the cause of the next one...

...it will be the cowardice, moral weakness, ignorance, and ineptitude of Barack Hussein Obama and the idiots and pretenders (Leon Panetta being prominent among them) he has surrounded himself with that will result in emboldening the enemy to attack a weakened America, and lead to the additional losses of American lives.

Barack Hussein Obama'a policies of appeasement and Muslim-love are paving the way for Iran, Al Qaeda, and every America-hating group on the planet to challenge and attack the American people...and Barack Hussein "Goddamn America" Obama is taking the first shots at sowing the seeds and paving the road of our destruction.

CIA Director Leon Panetta would do well to focus on the policies of his Commander-in-chief, not engaging in stupid and childish attacks on Cheney's warnings of their sure to be failure at succeeding in protecting us from what is sure to be the end result of their stupidity.

"Panetta told The New Yorker for an article in its June 22 issue that Cheney "smells some blood in the water" on the issue of national security"
_______________________________________________

QUESTION: If, as Panetta says, Vice-president Cheney "smells some blood in the water on the issue of national security," isn't Panetta then admitting that there is "blood in the water on the issue of national security" to be smelled?

QUESTION: If Cheney "smells blood in the water on the issue of national security," wouldn't it follow that Al Qaeda also smells some "blood in the water on the issue of national security"?

QUESTION: If Cheney, as an American who knows how to effectively fight terrorists as his record proves, "smells some blood in the water," doesn't it make more sense to enlist his support and to mine his wealth of knowledge in order to find the means to staunch the flow of "blood" rather than to make the asinine statement of childish accusation, rejection and whining that Panetta has chosen in response to those warnings?

Upon reading these comments coming from the Director of the CIA, Panetta ought to know that he is do nothing to staunch the flow of the smell of "some blood in the water," he is only signalling to the terrorists that they ought to be sniffing around too.

"Last month the former vice president offered a withering critique of Obama's policies and a defense of the Bush administration on the same day that Obama made a major speech about national security."

DELIBERATELY SKEWED CONTEXT?

Cheney's speech was scheduled for at least 3 weeks before Obama made the decision to give a rebuttal speech of his own ON THE SAME DAY that Cheney had already scheduled his!  Not the other way around as this AP writer would skew the context.

Vice-president Cheney didn't (as the propagandist who wrote this article suggests) offer his "withering critique" "on the same day that Obama made a major speech about national security"...Barack Obama chose to make his speech on the same day that Vice-president Cheney was already and beforehand scheduled to make his speech!  Barack Obama's entire speech was a pitiful and staged attempt at trying to offset the damage and embarrassment the White House realized that  was sure to result from Cheney's speech, and  to take the sting out of Cheney's "withering critique" of Obama's inane policies of Muslim terrorist @$$ki$$ing as a result of Obama's failed attempt to empty Guantanamo's terrorist prison camp and allow terrorist suspects to run free in American neighborhoods, while "relocating" here on the American taxpayer's dime.

Further (as if he has not humiliated himself enough):"Panetta said of Cheney's remarks:

"It's almost, a little bit, gallows politics. When you read behind it, it's almost as if he's wishing that this country would be attacked again, in order to make his point. I think that's dangerous politics."

This, on its face, is the most telling remark from Panetta: "gallows politics""dangerous politics"? Is this what the Director of Central Intelligence thinks Vice-president Cheney's concerns about national security are: "politics"?

More alarmingly THAT comment coming from Panetta (who is, after all, a POLITICIAN) PROVES that he is unfit to set aside HIS politics and fealty to the Democrat Party and its agenda, and to focus on concentrating his attentions on the national security of this nation.

While Leon Panetta, as Director of Central Intelligence, should be giving his undivided attention to sniffing out the terrorist plans of Al Qaeda and others who are plotting terrorist attacks, he is more concerned with providing cover for the mis-administration of our national security by Barack Hussein Obama.  Leon Panetta, by engaging in a political smear campaign against Dick Cheney; unleashing some made up characterization of Dick Cheney's warnings as "gallows politics" because of his being embarrassed by Cheney's voicing his concerns that Obama's policies are making us more vulnerable, signals Panetta's own being at a loss to perform his sworn duties as CIA Director. 

Can you imagine being an agent working under such petty leadership that sees patriots as being the enemy wishing death and destruction on this country, while the President he himself is working for is engaged in coddling and virtually aiding the real and identified enemy who has ALREADY carried out the most devastating attacks on America in the history of our Republic?

The signal Panetta sends to the Islamic extremists by his comments, are much more likely to cause us to be attacked than Cheney's WISHING (if such a claim could possibly tbe hought to make any sense) could ever make likely.

Such remarks as were made by Panetta are equivalent to my characterizing someone's warnings to me to "Hey, don't go down into that neighborhood because the gangs are out, I know, I've dealt with them before, and you're likely to be hurt or killed," as that person's wishing I be shot; and "gallows politics!"

And my reply to his warnings would be: "Oh...duh...the only reason he's telling me that is because he wants me to get shot."

This is LUDICROUS, and by the time that magazine hits the newsstands, Panetta ought to have done us all a favor by resigning his position as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency...

...WISHING that would be in the best interest of America's national security and might contribute to there being a little less of the smell of some blood in the water.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. SOLDIERS GUNNED DOWN BY MUSLIM TERRORIST IN LITTLE ROCK, ARK.

 Two U.S. Army Recruiters were gunned down in a drive-by shooting by a converted Muslim American this mornining and so far there has been absolutely NO RESPONSE FROM the WHITE HOUSE.

This is being reported on michaelsavage.com http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/ and some other Conservative websites, by NOTHING in the MSM so far. Barack Hussein "Goddamn America" Obama had been completely silent:

Obama Ignores Soldier's Murder at Recruiting Center; Reacted Quickly to Abortionist's Killing
Monday, June 1, 2009 | Kristinn

Posted on Monday, June 01, 2009 5:24:35 PM by kristinn

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2262461/posts?page=5 7

"In another slap to America's men and women serving in the armed forces, Barack Obama has ignored the fatal shooting attack on an Army-Navy recruiting center in Little Rock this morning that killed one serviceman and wounded another.

Yesterday, Obama issued a sharply worded statement condemning the shooting of late-term abortionist George Tiller within hours of his murder and Obama's Justice Department has ordered U.S. Marshalls to deploy at abortion clinics to give them protection.

Seven hours after the attack on the recruiting center, the same length of time it took Obama to issue a statement on the Tiller murder, there has been no statement from the commander-in-chief of the slain and wounded servicemen.

One of Obama's core constituencies is radical abortion supporters, not Americans in uniform. The contrast in his reactions to the two murderous attacks is chilling for those who support our fellow Americans in our armed forces.

Tiller was killed at 10 a.m. CDT Sunday, Obama issued his statement about seven hours later at 6 p.m. EDT.

The attack on the recruiting center happened around 10 a.m. CDT today. As of this writing at 6 p.m. EDT, there are no news reports of any statement by Obama on the murderous attack on our military."

THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE COME TO UNDER THE PRESIDENCY OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA'S MARXIST LIBERAL "SOCIAL JUSTICE" REQUIRES "VICTIMS"

 
The current Democrat-led "change" is a product of Marxist social "Conflict Theory" taught in liberal arts colleges of America as a means of instituting "social justice" in what is viewed as an oppressive capitalist form of government, which espouses that the structure of our form of government, itself, is what is at the root of human oppression and must necessarily be "changed" to allow for "social equality." Barack Hussein Obama is the "Trojan Horse" candidate the one world socialist oligarchs chose, precisely because of his indoctrination and belief in this philosophy, to use his "charm" and "appearance", and so forth, to institute it.

Largely, because of his ability to charm the masses of ignorant and celebrity-loving/worshipping spoiled Americans who after being primed by a conspiratorial mainstream media for the past 6 or 7 years of the Bush administration into a frenzy of hatred for Bush, the war in Iraq, Christianity/morality, and personal responsibility, were ready for "change" and "hope" .

All this coupled with a sense that conservatism was a party-pooper, in the sense that those who held up tradition and morality were a drag on their rights to party down 24-7--"be as gay and freaky as you wanna be; don't want nobody telling me that it's wrong to have same sex sex or dispense with my unwanted pregnancies--ooh, you're so passé--then there's that damn Bible...and Jesus...and all that...man, I just want to be free...."

Like it or not, they voted for "change"...and "change" is what they got. Only, I'm not sure they understood what that "change" would be.

The overwhelming majority of, once, traditional Democrats have little or no knowledge of the philosophies of the people they have been duped into unleashing upon America and it's free-market system. Whipped up in a frenzy of hatred for any and all moral underpinnings of our society, they were tricked under the slogan of "Change" to unwittingly elect a Marxist administration in the purest sense of the word.

Our liberal arts colleges and universities, aided by such individuals as William Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn and others of their ilk, have been indoctrinating our sons and daughters into policies which constantly bombard them with the notion of the failure to attain success in a capitalist society, such as ours, as to have nothing to do with the individual's poor choices and failure to avail his or herself of the opportunities that freedom and free-market capitalism only makes possible; but that the free-market competitive system of governance, itself, is structured in such a way as to cheat them of the lifestyle to which they are entitled.

This entitlement mentality has been carefully nurtured and tested, first with the black community over the past 40+ years, and has proven to be effective in coercing an entire segment of the population [black people] to accept this notion of themselves as victims of a structural barrier to their ever having a chance to become unghettoized under their own volition and without the largess of the Democrat Party system of a social welfare state. As a result of their allowing themselves to “religiously” support the notion that the Democrat Party view that black Americans are restricted in their achievement of the “American Dream” by a slavery-induced pathological retardation of their ability to succeed, Democrats have themselves become slaves of their own ideology that perpetuates and necessitates the continuing enslavement of blacks to a reliance on victimhood and the welfare state to further the cause of Party power. Ignorant, poor, and angry blacks (whipped into a constant frenzy of moralistic outrage by the likes of Wright, Sharpton, and Jackson, et al.) supplies the socialists with their most loyal voting bloc. They recognize the benefit of blacks as “angry, mostly self-marginalized societal outliers.

Building upon the success of this experiment in population control and political power, the Democrats took it to the next level in 2007-2008 by elevating what they knew was a community organizer schooled in the Marxist social philosophy of Conflict Theory, to unleash their goal of the destruction of capitalism in the U.S. and to insure the ascension of a Democrat-run socialist-collectivist government-as-god type of new world order.

Sound far-fetched?

If it does, it was meant to.
That is why Barack Obama's origins in Marxist social indoctrination was carefully hidden with the collusion of the Democrat-elite MSM throughout the entire election cycle.

I am currently working as a Senior at a university in downstate Illinois seeking a BSW in Social Work, precisely for the purpose of being in a position to battle the beast from within it's own camp. This is where the battle for the hearts and minds of American youth is being fought.

One of the textbooks we are studying, "Human Behavior and the Social Environment, Macro Level, by Katherine van Wormer, Fred H. Besthorn, and Thomas Keefe (2007), in describing the "highly-regarded" social work theory of "Conflict" [of which BHO is obviously an adherent] the authors state:

"Conflict theorists Piven and Cloward (1993) utilized the functionalist analysis method borrowed from Merton (1957) to enhance our understanding of how the social welfare system serves as a societal device for "regulating the poor" in the interest of capitalism. The latent function of social services, from this perspective, thus becomes to preserve the establishment. Piven and Cloward's basic premise, based on their review of social change throughout U.S. history, was that "relief arrangements are initiated or expanded during outbreaks of civil disorder produced by mass unemployment and are then abolished or contracted when political stability is restored" (p.xv).

In other words, the elites in society can be counted on to provide only enough aid, stigmatized at that, to prevent mass disorder and regulate labor.

(Despite their use of functional analysis, Piven and Cloward's perspectives are far more closely aligned ideologically with Marxism than with Parson's functionalist writings.)"

"Payne (2005) refers to conflict theory as radical and socialist-collectivist. Feminist, empowerment, and antioppressive perspectives are included under the rubric of radical, as well as the structuralist, approaches. We discuss the structuralist approach here because it places a strong emphasis on economic and social equality among people."

"These structuralist approaches, so called because the source of social problems is located in the social structure rather than in the individual, were inspired by the radical thinking of the 1970s, but their influence waned, as Payne speculates, with the collapse of communism in the 1980s. Along with the neo-conservatism of modern times and the concordant erosion of the welfare state, there is a renewed interest within social work in effecting social change."

"Structural social work is associated today with and best articulated through the writings of Canadian social work theorist Bob Mullaly...Much like his predecessors, Mullaly (1997), in his book "Structural Social Work," espouses a conflict-oriented view of society and recognizes that one's circumstances and difficulties are connected to one's economic and social position in society (Lundy, 2005). "Structural Social Work" is described by Payne as the major statement of Marxist social work."

"Mullaly's (1997, 2002) vision of social work practice is that it must be anticapitalist. If as social workers we do nothing to bring about progressive radical change, we fail the people we serve; we become part of the problem instead of the solution."
______________________________________________

This should give you a better understanding of what "progressive" liberals in today's Socialist-Democrat Party, under an Obama administration, are trying to implement in the United States as we speak.

You see, under their adherence to these types of theories [Marxist to their core] they have as their belief, that capitalism is bad, and Marxism is the solution.

There, fortunately, are other theories being taught which are just the opposite, but this is what is being bought into by the Democrats in our society who proudly define themselves these days as "progressives."

However, this Marxists Conflict perspective is being taught, now, as the dominant philosophy in our nation’s universities, especially in departments of social work, psychology, philosophy, and sociology.

It is not limited to these disciplines either.

Children are now, thanks to the influence of Mullaly and William Ayers, who is being allowed to oversee the curriculum of our public schools systems as an unrepentant Marxist-liberationist declared enemy of capitalism and the American style of economic system, being systematically indoctrinated into a skillful and careful disdain for this country’s founding free-market principles and the entire Federalist system of government rationale.  The very pursuit of individualist freedom on which this country and capitalism were founded, is thence, being portrayed as antithema to a "superior" collectivist social order. Marxist collectivism as being more "just" than Free-market individualism.

When you realize just how pervasive Marxist ideology has been slowly used to indoctrinate our schools, you will be able to better put into context the comments of so-called university professors, like Dr. Douglas, who are completely sold, along with their professional disciplines, on the welfare state.

Thus, their fanatical support for Barack Hussein Obama, a fellow believer.

Marxism 101--Obama style.


Again, one of the textbooks we are studying, "Human Behavior and the Social Environment, Macro Level, by Katherine van Wormer, Fred H. Besthorn, and Thomas Keefe (2007), in describing the "highly-regarded" social work theory of "Conflict" [of which BHO is obviously an adherent] the authors state:

"Conflict theorists Piven and Cloward (1993) utilized the functionalist analysis method borrowed from Merton (1957) to enhance our understanding of how the social welfare system serves as a societal device for "regulating the poor" in the interest of capitalism. The latent function of social services, from this perspective, thus becomes to preserve the establishment. Piven and Cloward's basic premise, based on their review of social change throughout U.S. history, was that "relief arrangements are initiated or expanded during outbreaks of civil disorder produced by mass unemployment and are then abolished or contracted when political stability is restored" (p.xv).”

Herein lies the rationale for the purposeful destruction being initiated by the current Obama administration as we speak. The purposeful creation of an atmosphere of economic meltdown . People wonder, “How can this administration be so stupid as to think their policies will not bankrupt the auto industry, lead to massive layoffs, drive up costs of doing business, and create hardship and loss of security for the middle class? Are they so stupid they don’t know this will be the result of their policies?”

The answer is no. Their belief is that without mass unemployment, no social change can be forced to support a welfare state. Where fatal flaw in their presumptuous philosophy is, is in the assumption that a welfare state is the way to affect positive “social change.”
If welfare programs are contracted or abolished in times of low unemployment and political stability it is precisely because these services are not as much in demand because the people are gainfully employed and, thus, do not require as much welfare! They are aware of this. “Then,” you may ask, “what is their motive in fighting such obvious prosperity?”

Because THEY wouldn't be needed!

The fields of social work, community organizing, politics, psychology, and other so-called “helping professions” have become less interested in “social justice” as they are in feeding on the misery of the culture of victimhood and the underclass they require to legitimize their continued existence as viable professions!

The LAST thing a social worker (community organizer), welfare administrator, or politician wants to realize is a depletion of the number of “victims” by which to justify their continued existence.  Absent any obvious "victims," "victims" must be either created, identified, or redefined.

As ghoulish as it may seem, social work(community organizing) and psychology programs thrive on the misery of masses of “victims.”

"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste, and what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you didn't think you could do before." -Rahm Emanuel, Obama Chief-of-Staff, Nov.21,2008

Obama’s policies will not only serve the purpose of allowing him to buy votes with replacing self-sufficiency with Obama and Democrat-run welfare largess; thus, requiring the ignorant masses of suffering minions to keep him in power once they become addicted to his handouts; it will also provide a steady flow of clients for social workers and the training that universities provide.

This is why Social Work programs, and the university system, is firmly committed to the Democrat Party…they know which side their bread is buttered on!

Liberal societies feed on Marxist ideology…it is necessary for their continued existence.

They are totally invested in the “welfare state” for their funding and it is their raison d’etre’.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IT'S TIME WE FACE THE TRUTH ABOUT AMERICA


America is divided. But this is not as simply defined as being between Democrats and Republicans; liberals and conservatives. We are divided into a battle for the soul of this nation, and the world. And that war is being waged between two factions, right here, within THIS country. On one side of the divide are those who want to uphold the traditions of Christianity; on the other are the reprobates led by “America is not a Christian nation” Barack Hussein Obama.

Although few have the courage or honesty to define it: We are in a spiritual battle for the very soul of the world and the left in this country has sided with the Islamists, atheists, Marxists, homosexuals, abortionists, or whoever else they can ally themselves with that oppose Jesus Christ and the God of Abraham. What do you think motivates their unanimous desire to stifle free speech? The speech that cuts them like a knife is only the word of God contained in one book and preached in Christian and Jewish houses of prayer: The Holy Bible. Don’t be deceived by any other excuses they make. This nation, America, is the last Christian stronghold left on earth and Israel is the only other one that has as its guide, the unerring word of God. Until Christians and Jews have been destroyed, the New World Order cannot complete the takeover of the souls of the world’s people. Americans and Israelis are barriers that stand in the way of total Socialist domination of men’s souls.

Gay marriage legislative battles going on all across this land are just another front; another facet of the battle that is being waged against the very foundation of this republic by the enemies wihtin it. A diversion and a recruitment tool to the God-haters, another paving stone on the road to government as god-in place of the living God.
 
What you need to realize from the characterizations liberals make of the Truth, is their total and complete hatred of Truth (i.e., God). God is Truth, and they are haters of God and lovers of the Satanic lifestyles: Abortion, Homosexuality, 2 men lying with one another as a man and woman were made to lie with each other (having and condoning unnatural sexual unions: women loving women; teaching our youth in the schools and universities that this is moral; while arresting pastors for repeating biblical scriptures that indicates the nature of these abominations. In order to justify the Culture of Death they love, they MUST deny the authority of God. They must silence the preacher. They must attack the Holy Word of God. To admit God is to accept that they condemn their souls by their being slaves to the pursuit of unnatural lusts and reprobate hearts.

They will NEVER allow themselves to admit to a need for repentance because it would mean forsaking the pleasures of carnality which, to them is more cherished than Truth, and life itself.

No. Obama is NOT the anti-Christ, but just as there are a remnant of us still left who seek to follow the guidance of the Holy Spirit; there are those who you are witnessing who are welcoming the "spirit" of the anti-Christ. Proud American Democrat, Ranger29, and others are such people. They revel in, what appears to them to be the "power" of the Satanic upsurge which is symbolized by what they think are "victories" associated with "homosexual" acceptance the condoning of abortion (human infant sacrifice), the perceived rise of Islamism, and what they think is a defeat for Jesus Christ.

NEVER let them shake YOUR faith. They know they have chosen damnation, and because they know it, they hate those who have the courage to resist that which they have allowed to destroy them.
 
Their only real battle being waged in this country comes down to a battle over the liberal’s incessant attempts to bastardize morality; making right wrong and wrong right; their goal is to try to destroy you and your faith in the power of God.

Study your Bible and listen to God’s messengers who speak Truth to the power of Satan the Liar. Teach your children, and their children, the Truth of the nature of God, and godliness. Show yourselves approved before God, and continue to let your light so shine that you remain a curse to them like garlic (or The Cross) is to a vampire. For they represent those who have become dead in their spirits; having embraced a chance to worship evil over good.
So we must always keep in mind, when “debating” with people such as the liberal “progressive” trolls that come on here daily to post their evil and vile comments about all decency; they are not merely warring against us; they are warring against what we stand for; THE GOD OF THE BIBLE! That is why they are more willing to embrace even Islam before Christianity, even though Islam has issued a sentence of death upon their very lives. Why not? Whether abortion, homosexual marriages, or Islam; the result is the same: Death. They embrace Islam because they HATE GOD and the authority of Jesus Christ. Make no mistake about it.

It won’t be long before they enact their “fairness doctrine” in an attempt to silence and separate us from the Truth. They will even come for some of us, because for them, Christians are the only threat they fear…and for good reason.

Once you understand and accept this, you will realize that The final battle has been joined. Satan is a liar and Barack Hussein Obama is one of his disciples; as are his apologists. Barack Hussein Obama is not the anti-Christ, but what is true about him and his followers is that he, and those who worship him are possessed of the spirit of the anti-Christ to come. What they don’t yet realize is that We shall prevail.

SEMPER FIDELIS.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FROM NOTRE DAME TO NOTRE DAMNED

 

Perhaps after Barack Hussein Obama takes his show to South Bend this weekend, Mr. Jenkins will consider a name change for the nation's premier Catholic University; from Notre Dame to Notre Damned.

Notre Dame was originally owned and directed by the Congregation of Holy Cross, whose motherhouse in the United States is located at Notre Dame, the name by which the university is most commonly known. However, the General Administration of THE CONGREGATION OF HOLY CROSS remains in Vatican City, Via Framura, 85 00168 Rome, Italy

The University of Notre Dame was founded by the Congregation of Holy Cross and in 1844 it was established as a civil moral person by a legislative act of the state of Indiana. On March 6, 1967, with the consent of the Holy Father Pope Paul VI, in the spirit of Vatican Council II with its clarion call for all Catholics to take greater responsibility for living and strengthening the life of the Church, the Congregation of Holy Cross ceded its ownership of the University of Notre Dame to a Board of Fellows. The University remains, however, under the continuous sponsorship of the Congregation of Holy Cross.

The change of ownership of the University of Notre Dame from the Congregation of Holy Cross took place in light of the Second Vatican Council's recommendation that competent laity play a more significant role in the administration of religious and ecclesiastical property.

Through this unprecedented gesture the Congregation of Holy Cross sought to offer competent lay Catholics broader responsibility for Catholic higher education without jeopardizing the authentic Catholic character of the institution.

On April 1, 2009, the Administrator of the Congregation of the Holy Cross wrote a letter from the Vatican which in part states:

"President Obama, your presence at Notre Dame, a premier Catholic institution, is regarded by many good Catholics as scandalous because of your support of abortion rights, regarded by us as an intrinsic evil. In awarding you this degree, they experience Notre Dame as undermining essential, intrinsic Catholic dogma which upholds the dignity of human life. They believe that in honoring you or in giving you a platform to speak, the University of Notre Dame is selling her soul for who knows what: perhaps, at best, for the prestige and glory of having the President of the United States on campus during his first year in office or perhaps at worst, giving an endorsement to your “anti-life policies.”

I do not believe this outrage is simply a demonstration of partisan politics. I sincerely want to rejoice in your presence at Notre Dame as President of the United States. But really, can I? In all sincerity, President Obama, how are we Catholics to deal with you, or any other government leader, who upholds what we believe to be the intrinsic evil of abortion and who is willing to sign the FOCA legislation? How are we to confront Catholic leaders in your own Administration by whom we feel so abandoned?"

Clear evidence that, although Mr. Jenkins (he’s not worthy to be called Father)  does not have the support of higher ups in the Catholic hierarchy. Yet he feels compelled to bestow his University’s highest honors on a man who not only has none of the “empathy” for unborn (or inconveniently born) children that he claims to value in a Supreme Court justice nominee; but one who when speaking at another revered Catholic University (Georgetown) required Georgetown to cover a monogram symbolizing Jesus' name in Gaston Hall, which Obama used for his speech. I wonder if Mr. Jenkins will be required to cover the image of “Touchdown Jesus” that sits behind the Notre Dame goalposts.

‘When Government outlaws God, Government becomes God.’

Jenkins has said Notre Dame does not support Obama's positions on issues regarding the protection of human life but that his appearance provides "a basis for further positive engagement." Has there been some previous “positive engagement” about Barack Hussein Obama’s views on the right to life of unborn children that everyone else is unaware of. Perhaps to “provide “a basis for further positive engagement of their own,  the  “progressive” University of Chicago and William Ayers will extend an invitation to Dick Cheney or George W. Bush to speak at their next year’s commencement address.

Some idiot on another TH thread related to this story even had the audacity to claim that the protestations against Obama speaking were meaningless since, “Notre Dame left the Roman Catholic Church in 1966.”

A bold-faced lie.

Notre Dame did not leave the Roman Catholic Church in 1966, or ever. The University of Notre Dame Board of Trustees continues to hold its annual winter meetings each year in Rome.

This is an excerpt from a letter written by Holy Cross Priests to Notre Dame on April 10, 2009:

http://www.cdobs.com/archive/featured/holy-cross-priests-ob ject-to-notre-dame-honor-of-obama,11181

Holy Cross Priests Object to Notre Dame Honor of Obama

Wilson D. Miscamble C.S.C 10 April 2009

"We write as priests of the Congregation of Holy Cross and as proud graduates of the University of Notre Dame to voice our objection to the University’s decision to honor President Barack Obama by inviting him to deliver this year’s Commencement address and by conferring on him an honorary Doctor of Laws degree.

We wish to associate ourselves with and encourage those courageous students and treasured alumni who, while deeply loving Notre Dame, vigorously oppose this sad and regrettable decision of the University administration.

It is our deep conviction that Notre Dame should lead by word and deed in upholding the Church’s fundamental teaching that human life must be respected and protected from the moment of conception. In so doing the University must take seriously the 2004 instruction of the U.S. Catholic Bishops that “Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles. They should not be given awards, honors, or platforms which would suggest support for their actions.”

Surely, for Notre Dame to honor THIS president when he symbolizes the most horrendous abortion procedures that not only kill children in the womb, but would also have made it a legal REQUIREMENT for hospitals and doctors to withhold treatment from those infants having SURVIVED a failed abortion attempt is unconscionable.

Perhaps, after this sorry affair, and as a result of Mr. Jenkins' intransigence in retracted this damnable and detestable invitation to bestow one of Catholic Notre Dame's highest honors on the president of "Goddamn America" and the most heinour and evil methods of abortion, perhaps he ought also consider changing the name of his University to commemorate the event, from Notre Dame to Notre Damned.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America…A Nation Now Governed by Fools

 
Human rights in Cuba are a subject of much debate. In practice, repression is "is written into Cuban law" according to Human Rights Watch.

International human rights organizations accuse the Cuban regime of systematic human rights abuses, including torture, arbitrary imprisonment, unfair trials, and extrajudicial executions (a.k.a. "El Paredón").

Cuban law harshly limits freedom of expression, association, assembly, movement, and the press. There is no due process; the judicial system is constitutionally subordinate to the government.

Censorship is extensive; Cuba ranks on the bottom of the 2008 Press Freedom Index. The few Cubans with official permissions to access Internet face Internet surveillance; the vast majority of Cubans face five-year prison sentences for connecting to Internet.

Like in many other socialist countries, emigration is illegal; even discussing emigration carries a six-month prison sentence.

Human Rights Watch states that "Although in theory the different branches of government have separate and defined areas of authority, in practice the executive retains clear control over all levers of power. The courts, which lack independence, undermine the right to fair trial by severely restricting the right to a defense." and "The government also imprisons or orders the surveillance of individuals who have committed no illegal act, relying upon provisions that penalize “dangerousness” (estado peligroso) and allow for “official warning” (advertencia oficial)."

Cuban people of African ancestry suffer from racism.

Although the population is now mainly black or mixed-race and young, its rulers are "mainly white".

Esteban Morales Dominguez has pointed to institutionalized racism in his book The Challenges of the Racial Problem in Cuba (Fundación Fernando Ortiz). Racial Politics in Post-Revolutionary Cuba discusses the racial politics prevalent in communist Cuba.

Enrique Patterson describes race as "social bomb" and says that "If the Cuban government were to permit black Cubans to organize and raise their problems before [authorities] . . . totalitarianism would fall". Carlos Moore, who has authored extensive on the issue, says that "There is an unstated threat, blacks in Cuba know that whenever you raise race in Cuba, you go to jail. Therefore the struggle in Cuba is different. There cannot be a civil rights movement. You will have instantly 10,000 black people dead.”  He says that a new generation of black Cubans are looking at politics in another way.

Jorge Luis García Pérez, who was imprisoned and tortured for 17 years, states "The authorities in my country have never tolerated that a black person oppose the regime. During the trial, the color of my skin aggravated the situation. Later when I was mistreated in prison by guards, they always referred to me as being black".

Black Cuban activist José Luis García Pérez (Antúnez) has been in hunger strike since February 17, 2009 in support of Cuban political prisoners. Antúnez's hunger strike is taking place at his home in the Cuban city of Placetas, in the Sancti Spiritus province. Cuban political police officers have taken over Placetas and have denied foreign reporters’ access to Antúnez.

Antúnez's home was attacked in the pre-dawn hours of Wednesday March 25th by State Security agents, according to the Cuban Democratic Directorate. The human rights activist has been in the house along with other Cuban members of the pro-democracy movement

Numerous opposition activists and Cubans not associated with the opposition movement have been detained as a result, including Ciro Díaz, who plays guitar in the underground punk rock band Porno para Ricardo, and photographer Claudio Fuentes on March 23.

The strike, begun on February 17 2009, demands of the Havana government that inhumane treatment end against prisoner Mario Pérez Aguilera, held at Santa Clara Provincial Prison; that Cuban citizen Caridad García Pérez be permitted to repair her home using her own means; and that the texts of the international human rights agreements signed by the Cuban government in February 2008, which the Cuban people do not know about, be published in Cuba. Joining Antúnez in this protest are fellow activists Iris Pérez Aguilera and Diosiris Santana Pérez.

http://www.contactomagazine.com/articles/cubaninhungerstrike0309.htm

Last January, the Cuban government celebrated its 50th anniversary in power after a 1959 revolution that soon became a Communist regime supported by the now defunct Soviet Union.

Even well-known so-called “progressive” leftists in American academia lament Castro’s racially-biased repressive regime.

This from Nathan Newman who is a contributing writer to such “progressive” [Socialist] propaganda rags as “The Nation” in an article dated, April 13, 2003.

“Democratic Left Against Cuban Repression”

“Below is a statement circulating among democratic left/socialist folks, largely by members of Democratic Socialists of America, condemning the recent trials and convictions of non-violent dissenters in Cuba. For those who know the left, there will be familiar names such as The Nation's Katha Pollitt, left historians like Maurice Isserman and Mel Dubofsky, 2002 NY Green Party Gubernatorial candidate Stanley Aronowitz, left journalists Doug Ireland and Ian Williams, and a host of other democratic left activists.

Many on the left will say this is the wrong time for this kind of letter by leftists who oppose the embargo and, even worse, military invasion as a wrong-headed approach to dealing with Castro's regime. I disagree. I think this is exactly the right time for the Left to act in solidarity with the Cuban people in defense of both democracy and social justice in that country. We should not force dissidents to choose between Bush's rightwing capitalist militarism and Castro's authoritarian repressive social justice policies. This is a call for leftist activists to stand up for both social justice and human rights against militarists and authoritarians of all persuasions.”

The Letter:

"We are women and men of the democratic left, united by our commitment to human rights, democratic government and social justice, in our own nations and around the world. In solidarity with the people of Cuba, we condemn the Cuban state's current repression of independent thinkers and writers, human rights activists and democrats. For "crimes" such as the authorship of essays critical of the government and meeting with delegations of foreign political leaders, some 80 non-violent political dissidents have been arrested, summarily tried in a closed court, without adequate notice or counsel, convicted, and given cruel, harsh sentences of decades of imprisonment. These are violations of the most elementary norms of due process of law, reminiscent of the Moscow trials of the Soviet Union under the rule of Stalin…

 The only conclusion that we can draw from this brute repression is that Cuban government does not trust the Cuban people to distinguish truth from falsehood, fact from disinformation. A government of the left must have the support of the people: it must guarantee human rights and champion the widest possible democracy, including the right to dissent, as well as promote social justice. By its actions, the Cuban state declares [that it is], despite its claims of social progress in education and health care, just one more dictatorship, concerned with maintaining its monopoly of power above all else.”

http://www.nathannewman.org/log/archives/000912.shtml

At the time this letter was written in 2003, it was signed by well over one hundred SOCIALISTS from all over the world!

 That these ignorant self-aggrandizing American Negroes (and as a black man myself, that the best term I can think of to call them) could go to Cuba and allow themselves to be used by a murderous butcher of black Cuban men and women, only further illustrates the degree of the insanity and soulless fealty to the basest instincts  in man a so-called “liberal” will stoop to, in order to embrace anything that is at odds with the best interests of the United States of America….even if it means the sacrifice of their own best interests. The Congressional Black Caucus is an embarrassment to, not only this country, but to me as an American who happens to have been born a black American. Made up of nothing but Democrats, it should be clarified that they do not represent a diversity of black Americans. As far as I am concerned, they only represent the fools who put them into office.

This nation is now being governed by fools…or worse, devils.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE PRESIDENT OF "GODDAMN AMERICA"

We've just witnessed what is surely a very important - I hesitate to say historic - moment in transatlantic relations. Barack Obama went further than any previous president in apologising for American behavior.

"In America, there is a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world," the President of "Goddamn America" read from a teleprompter prepared speech delivered before a campaign-style "town hall meeting" in which he took questions from mainly French and German students.
 
What is Europe's leading role in the world? 

Was it Europe's leading role in the world that stood up to, and took down Adolph Hitler's Third Reich and Benito Mussolini as the Nazis Blitzkrieged their way across the piteous European continent toppling one country after another leaving a trail of death, misery, and bombed out cities and towns? 

Was it Europe whose leadership liberated the death camps of Buchenwald and Dachau? 

Perhaps it was "Europe's leading role in the world" that was responsible for liberating Poland and France and Romania and Austria and Romania from Hitlerian Nazi occupation. 

Can we now attribute the defeat of Al Qaeda and the almost complete end to their worldwide exportation of indiscriminate murder and Islamic aggression against Christians and Jews and anyone who refuses to bow down to their malevolent repressive hate-filled "god" to "Europe's leading role in the world" in standing up to the Islamists?
 
Just what is "Europe's leading role in the world" that I (and apparently all us failures who call ourselves Americans) are failing to appreciate?
 
Apparently the President of "Goddamn America's" teleprompter hadn't been programmed to provide the answer to these questions.
 
And what is the "leadership role" that this President of "Goddamn America" Barack Hussein Obama sees as his duty to this country other than to destroy it? 

Does Barack Hussein Obama and his teleprompters perceive his role as being the Diplomat of Appeasement to Hamas, and Iran, China, Russia, Syria, and Cuba?  He certainly cannot find it within his teleprompter to criticise anyone but the people he was presumably elected to represent, while heaping nothing but praise and apology for our "arrogance" and "derisiveness" upon those who represent our undoing.
 
And if Europe has the "leading role in the world," what is the role America is to play to "Europe's leading role" in the opinion of the President of "Goddamn America" Barack Hussein Obama?
 

The man who has never had anything good to say about this country, and who before becoming President was a rabble-rousing "community organizer" who, along with his radical leftist America-hating buddies had as their agenda to "fight against 'the man'" and overthrow our system of government; some of them openly declaring war on America and engaging in terrorist bombings, went further to add:

"Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive."
 
Ah...perhaps the role of the President of "Goddamn America" Barack Hussein Obama, sees as his "leading role in the world" to be to offset the "arrogance," "dismissiveness," and "derision" of Americans by displaying to the leaders of Europe his own arrogance, dismissiveness, and even derision of America, using the world stage to dismiss our achievements and heroism at every opportunity. 

Thanks to what I consider the enemies and haters of America who elected this less-than-a man to officiate over the destruction of our Constitutional government, we now have been "blessed" with a "president" that has as his mission in life to not only concede America's leadership, but one who is all too willing to spit on the graves of all the Americans who throughout the 20th century and in two world wars, liberated Europe and the world from Nazism, Soviet enslavement, and the fascism that Europe itself bred and from which it has never had the need, the courage, or the ability to save itself.

We have, thanks to the people who voted this irresponsible @$$ho!e into power, a president who the world is taking the measure of...and who find him sorely lacking in any sense honesty, integrity, intelligence, authority, leadership or character.

The President of "Goddamn America"... at all costs.

It won't be "Europe's leading role in the world" that will defeat his attempt to introduce Socialism and fascism to America and stave off this new attempt to break the will of the American people being actively perpetrated by the likes of President "Goddamn America" and his Democrat Socialist cabal of dictatorial Congressional despots...

It will be the very descendants of those Americans, you and I, they so openly despise.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Some Proud...Many…Discomfited

 
Is this the end of America?

This is the question posed in a March 19, 2009 article written by Terence Corcoran for Canada’s Financial Post.

The opening paragraph of his article reads:

“Helicopter Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve is dropping trillions of fresh paper dollars on the world economy, the President of the United States is cracking jokes on late night comedy shows, his energy minister is threatening a trade war over carbon emissions, his treasury secretary is dithering over a banking reform program amid rising concerns over his competence and a monumentally dysfunctional U.S. Congress is launching another public jihad against corporations and bankers.

As an aghast world — from China to Chicago and Chihuahua — watches, the circus-like U.S. political system seems to be declining into near chaos. Through it all, stock and financial markets are paralyzed. The more the policy regime does, the worse the outlook gets. The multi-ringed spectacle raises a disturbing question in many minds: Is this the end of America?”

Going on to talk about the resiliency of Americans past, he goes on to write a little further on:

 "Past success, however, is no guarantee of future recovery, especially now when there are daily disasters and new indicators of political breakdown. All developments are not disasters in themselves. The AIG bonus firestorm is a diversion from real issues , but it puts the ghastly political classes who make U.S. law on display for what they are: ageing self-serving demagogues who have spent decades warping the U.S. political system for their own ends. We see the system up close, law-making that is riddled with slapdash, incompetence and gamesmanship.

One test of whether we are witnessing the end of America is how many more times Americans put up with congressional show trials of individual business people and their employees, slandering and vilifying them for their actions and motives. And for how long will they tolerate a President who berates business and corporations as dens of crime and malfeasance? If the majority of Americans come to accept the caricatures of business as true, then America is closer to the end of its life as a global leader, as a champion of markets and individualism."

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/ 2009/03/19/terence-corcoran-is-this-the-end-of-america.aspx

______________________________________________

Up in Connecticut this weekend, we already got one example of how mindless, easily-duped Obama Kool-aid drinking liberal stooges will react:

By turning their anger against other private citizens under the direction and finger-pointing of those "ageing self-serving demagogues who have spent decades warping the U.S. political system for their own ends," while they pridefully insist that we all continue to "tolerate a President who berates business and corporations as dens of crime and malfeasance."
_____________________________________________

"If the majority of Americans come to accept the caricatures of business as true, then America is closer to the end of its life as a global leader, as a champion of markets and individualism."
_____________________________________________

If you read the often ghoulish commentary and asinine gloating of the Obama sycophant libtards supporting any and all Democrat nonsense on these threads, and in 100% of our public school system classrooms from kindergarten to graduate school...the end of American life may be closer than you think.

Rather than protest the ineptitude and outright criminality of the den of thieves in Washington, D.C., the brainwashed minions of Obamanation allow themselves to be rounded up like sheep by ACORN brownshirts (or some other middle-aged hippie retread professor-types) and herded into charter buses,  to be shuttled to the homes of AIG employees to demonstrate against what they are told is the enemy of the poor: "rich people" (no doubt participating in a sing-along along the way to strains of “Yes we can…can…can—Yes we can…can…can”).

These people are as much culpable for the destruction of our way of life as the denizens of private demonization in high office, while never having the intelligence to realize that the only thing they are demonstrating is their ignorance and inability to see the forest for the trees. Seeing only the mote in the "rich" man's eye, they remain oblivious to the beam being shoved up their own rectums by the Demonrat –led Congress and the Obamanated White House.

The whole world's watching.

It wasn't enough that he made a complete @ss of himself on Thursday night's Jay Leno show. He's back at it tonight doing the only thing he knows how to do: Mug for the cameras.

As he makes yet another spectacle of himself on 60 Minutes tonight in what amounts to yet another campaign appearance, Barack Hussein Obama will once again show just how vacuous and unconcerned he is with doing any actual work; his overriding and primary concern being personal gratuitous celebrity.

What seems to be a sense of pride in Obamanation to some here...serves as a discomfiting and frightening embarrassment to many others.

The Election of Barack Hussein Obama...most possibly will turn out to be the greatest tragedy in the history of America.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »